 
  
  
  
  
 
The key to pinning down the existence and type of transition is a study
of correlation length and in-plane susceptibility, because their
divergences constitute the most direct evidence of a phase transition.
These quantities are much more difficult to measure, and large lattices
are required in order to avoid finite size effects.  These key points
are lacking in the previous works, and are the focus of our study.  By
extensive use of the Mark IIIfp Hypercube, we are able to measure spin
correlations and thermodynamic quantities accurately on very large
lattices ( ).  Our work  
[Ding:90h;92a] provides convincing evidence that a phase transition
does occur at a finite temperature in the extreme quantum case, spin-
).  Our work  
[Ding:90h;92a] provides convincing evidence that a phase transition
does occur at a finite temperature in the extreme quantum case, spin- .  
At transition point,
.  
At transition point,  , the correlation length
and susceptibility diverge exactly according to the form of
Kosterlitz-Thouless (Equation 6.18).
, the correlation length
and susceptibility diverge exactly according to the form of
Kosterlitz-Thouless (Equation 6.18).
We plot the correlation length,  , and the susceptibility,
, and the susceptibility,  , in 
Figures 6.18 and 6.19.  They show a tendency of 
divergence at some finite
, in 
Figures 6.18 and 6.19.  They show a tendency of 
divergence at some finite  .  Indeed, we fit them to the form predicted 
by Kosterlitz and Thouless for the classical model
.  Indeed, we fit them to the form predicted 
by Kosterlitz and Thouless for the classical model
The fit is indeed very good ( per degree of freedom is 0.81),
as shown in Figure 6.18.  The fit for correlation length gives
 per degree of freedom is 0.81),
as shown in Figure 6.18.  The fit for correlation length gives 

A similar fit for susceptibility,  is also very good 
(
 is also very good 
( ):
):

as shown in Figure 6.19.  The good quality of both fits and the 
closeness of  's obtained are the main results of this work.  The fact 
that these fits also reproduce the expected scaling behavior
's obtained are the main results of this work.  The fact 
that these fits also reproduce the expected scaling behavior  with
 with
is a further consistency check.  These results strongly indicate that the 
spin-1/2 XY model undergoes a Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transition at 
 .  We note that this
.  We note that this  is consistent with the trend 
of the ``twist energy'' [Loh:85a] and that the rapid increase of vortex 
density near
 is consistent with the trend 
of the ``twist energy'' [Loh:85a] and that the rapid increase of vortex 
density near  is due to the unbinding of vortex pairs.
Figures 6.18 and 6.19 also indicate that the 
critical region
 is due to the unbinding of vortex pairs.
Figures 6.18 and 6.19 also indicate that the 
critical region  is quite wide (
 is quite wide ( ), which is very similar 
to the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model, where the
), which is very similar 
to the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model, where the  behavior holds 
up to
 behavior holds 
up to  .  These two-dimensional phenomena are in sharp contrast to 
the usual second-order transitions in three dimensions.
.  These two-dimensional phenomena are in sharp contrast to 
the usual second-order transitions in three dimensions.
   
Figure 6.18: Correlation Length and Fit.  (a)  versus T.  The vertical
line indicates
 versus T.  The vertical
line indicates  diverges at
 diverges at  ; (b)
; (b)  versus
 versus 
 .  The straight line indicates
.  The straight line indicates  .
.
   
Figure: (a) This figure repeats the plot of Figure 6.18(a)
showing on a coarser scale both the high temperature expansion (HTE) and the 
Kosterlitz-Thouless fit (KT). (b) Susceptibility  and Fit
 and Fit
The algebraic exponent  is consistent with the Ornstein-Zernike 
exponent
 is consistent with the Ornstein-Zernike 
exponent  at higher T.  As
 at higher T.  As  ,
,  shifts 
down slightly and shows signs of approaching 1/4, the value at
 shifts 
down slightly and shows signs of approaching 1/4, the value at  for the 
classical model.  This is consistent with Equation 6.21.
 for the 
classical model.  This is consistent with Equation 6.21.
   
Figure 6.20: Specific Heat  .  For
.  For  , the lattice size is
, the lattice size is
 .
.
We measured energy and specific heat,  (for
 (for  we used a
 we used a
 lattice).  The specific heat is shown in 
Figure 6.20.  We found that
 lattice).  The specific heat is shown in 
Figure 6.20.  We found that  has a peak above
 has a peak above  , at 
around
, at 
around  .  The peak clearly shifts away from
.  The peak clearly shifts away from  on the much 
smaller
 on the much 
smaller  lattice.  DeRaedt, et al. [DeRaedt:84a] 
suggested a logarithmic divergent
 lattice.  DeRaedt, et al. [DeRaedt:84a] 
suggested a logarithmic divergent  in their simulation, which is likely 
an artifact of their small m values.  One striking feature in
Figure 6.20 is a very steep increase of
 in their simulation, which is likely 
an artifact of their small m values.  One striking feature in
Figure 6.20 is a very steep increase of  at
 at  . 
The shape of the curve is asymmetric near the peak.  These features of the
. 
The shape of the curve is asymmetric near the peak.  These features of the 
 curve differ from that in the classical XY model [Gupta:88a].
 curve differ from that in the classical XY model [Gupta:88a].
 
 
  
  
  
 