
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 

Given  , it has been observed empirically (see Gropp and
Keyes [111]) that there often exists an optimal value of
, it has been observed empirically (see Gropp and
Keyes [111]) that there often exists an optimal value of  which minimizes the total computational time for solving the problem.
A small
which minimizes the total computational time for solving the problem.
A small  provides a better, but more expensive, coarse grid
approximation, and requires solving more, but smaller, subdomain
solves.  A large
 provides a better, but more expensive, coarse grid
approximation, and requires solving more, but smaller, subdomain
solves.  A large  has the opposite effect.  For model problems, the
optimal
 has the opposite effect.  For model problems, the
optimal  can be determined for both sequential and parallel
implementations (see Chan and Shao [53]).  In
practice, it may pay to determine a near optimal value of
 can be determined for both sequential and parallel
implementations (see Chan and Shao [53]).  In
practice, it may pay to determine a near optimal value of
 empirically if the preconditioner is to be re-used many times.
However, there
may also be geometric constraints on the range of values that
 empirically if the preconditioner is to be re-used many times.
However, there
may also be geometric constraints on the range of values that  can
take.
 can
take.