Subject: Re: latest pt2pt chapter draft...

From: [email-masked] (Tom Henderson)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 08:38:05 MDT

Marc,

A wee nit-pick...   :-)

In the June 20 and May 28 pt2pt drafts, Section 1.5, first paragraph, a new 
sentence has been added since we voted on the second reading:    

"The syntax is designed to be extendable so that new types of buffers can (be) 
added by vendors."  

Do we really want to say this?  I'd rather not.  It seems to go against the 
whole idea of "standardization".  IMHO, something like

"The syntax is designed to be extendable so that new types of buffers can be 
added in future versions of MPI."  

would be better.  

Tom